{"id":3786,"date":"2023-02-24T22:29:03","date_gmt":"2023-02-25T03:29:03","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/wpw.bnl.gov\/rgupta\/?page_id=3786"},"modified":"2023-02-25T21:58:54","modified_gmt":"2023-02-26T02:58:54","slug":"1968-week-5","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/wpw.bnl.gov\/rgupta\/1968-week-5\/","title":{"rendered":"1968 Week 5"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p><strong><a>SUPERCONDUCTING MAGNETS<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>(Fifth Week)<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Chairman: W.B. Sampson, Brookhaven National Laboratory<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/wpw.bnl.gov\/rgupta\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/9\/2023\/02\/photos-week5.pdf\">(Photos)<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><br>Bill Sampson\u2019s week on superconducting magnets was the most popular of the Summer Study. Superconducting magnets were described, from the huge affairs under construction for large bubble chambers to miniature units suitable for transport of particle beams. It was during this week that Peter Smith of the Rutherford laboratory brought forward his suggestions for stabilizing superconducting magnets and for reducing ac losses. These ideas already have inspired programs in a number of laboratories; thus far Smith appears to have been correct in all of his predictions.<br>&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Following papers were submitted for publication:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/wpw.bnl.gov\/rgupta\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/9\/2023\/02\/0709.pdf\">Stress Problems Associated with Superconducting and Cryogenic Magnets<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; P.G. Marston, Magnetic Engineering Associates<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/wpw.bnl.gov\/rgupta\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/9\/2023\/02\/0714.pdf\">Stresses in Magnetic Field Coils<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; W.F. Westendorp and R.W. Kilb, General Electric Company<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/wpw.bnl.gov\/rgupta\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/9\/2023\/02\/0727.pdf\">Very High Field Hybrid Magnet Systems<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp;D. Bruce Montgomery, J.E.C. Williams, N.T. Pierce, R. Weggel, and M.J. Leupold,<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Francis Bitter National Magnet Laboratory<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/wpw.bnl.gov\/rgupta\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/9\/2023\/02\/0748.pdf\">Principles of Stability in Cooled Superconducting Magnets<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Z.J.J. Stekly, R. Thome, and B. Strauss, Avco Everette Research Laboratory<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/wpw.bnl.gov\/rgupta\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/9\/2023\/02\/0765.pdf\">The 1.8 Tesla, 4.8 m i.d. Bubble Chanmer Magnet<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; J.R. Purcell, Argonne National Laboratory<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/wpw.bnl.gov\/rgupta\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/9\/2023\/02\/0786.pdf\">The Superconducting Magnet for the Proposed 25-foot Cryogenic Bubble Chamber<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; A.G. Prodell, Brookhaven National Laboratory<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/wpw.bnl.gov\/rgupta\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/9\/2023\/02\/0794.pdf\">The Superconducting Magnet for the Brookhaven National Laboratory 7-foot Bubble chamber<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; D.P. Brown, R.W. Burgess, and G.T. Mulholland, Brookhaven National Laboratory<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/wpw.bnl.gov\/rgupta\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/9\/2023\/02\/0815.pdf\">A 70 kilogauss Magnet for the Proposed Rutherford Laboratory 1.5 m Diameter Hydrogen Bubble Chamber<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; P.T.M. Clee, D.B. Thomas, and C.W. Trowbridge, Rutherford Laboratory<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/wpw.bnl.gov\/rgupta\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/9\/2023\/02\/0828.pdf\">Development Program for the Magnet of the European 3.7 m Bubble Chamber<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Presented by F. Wittgenstein, CERN<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/wpw.bnl.gov\/rgupta\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/9\/2023\/02\/0839.pdf\">A Possible Source of Instability in \u201cFully Stabilized\u201d Magnets<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; P.F. Smith, M.N. Wilson, and J.D. Lewin, Rutherford Laboratory<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/wpw.bnl.gov\/rgupta\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/9\/2023\/02\/0843.pdf\">Analytical Design of Superconducting Multipolar Magnets<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Richard A. Beth, Brookhaven National Laboratory<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/wpw.bnl.gov\/rgupta\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/9\/2023\/02\/0860.pdf\">Superconducting Magnetic Dipoles<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; G. Parzen, Brookhaven National Laboratory<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/wpw.bnl.gov\/rgupta\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/9\/2023\/02\/0866.pdf\">Superconducting Quadrupole Focusing Lens \u2013 Part I: Analytical Design and Full-Scale Copper-Wound Pole<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; A. Asner, CERN<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/wpw.bnl.gov\/rgupta\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/9\/2023\/02\/0880.pdf\">Superconducting Quadrupole Focusing Lens \u2013 Part II: Construction and Preliminary Tests<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; D.N. Cornish, Culham Laboratory<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/wpw.bnl.gov\/rgupta\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/9\/2023\/02\/0886.pdf\">Quadrupole Focusing Magnet<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; J.D. Rogers, W.V. Hassenzahl, H.L. Laquer, and J. K. Novak, Los Alamos National Laboratory<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/wpw.bnl.gov\/rgupta\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/9\/2023\/02\/0888.pdf\">The Rutherford Laboratory Bending Magnet<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; M.N. Wilson, R.V. Stovold, and J.D. Lawson, Rutherford Laboratory<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/wpw.bnl.gov\/rgupta\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/9\/2023\/02\/0893.pdf\">Brookhaven Superconducting dc Beam Magnets<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; R.B. Britton, Brookhaven National Laboratory<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/wpw.bnl.gov\/rgupta\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/9\/2023\/02\/0908.pdf\">Pulsed Superconducting Magnets<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; W.B. Sampson, Brookhaven National Laboratory<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/wpw.bnl.gov\/rgupta\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/9\/2023\/02\/0913.pdf\">Intrinsically Stable Conductors<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; P.F. Smith, M.N. Wilson, C.R. Walters, and J.D. Lewin, Rutherford Laboratory<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/wpw.bnl.gov\/rgupta\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/9\/2023\/02\/0920.pdf\">Superconducting Magnets for Controlled Thermonuclear Research<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; C.E. Taylor, Lawrence Radiation Laboratory, Livermore<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/wpw.bnl.gov\/rgupta\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/9\/2023\/02\/0926.pdf\">On Helium II Microstabilization of Nb<sub>3<\/sub>Sn<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; W.H. Bergmann, Argonne National Laboratory<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/wpw.bnl.gov\/rgupta\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/9\/2023\/02\/0929.pdf\">Progress on the IMP Facility<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; D.L. Coffey and W.F. Gauster, Oak Ridge National Laboratory<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/wpw.bnl.gov\/rgupta\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/9\/2023\/02\/0944.pdf\">Standardized Tests for Superconducting Materials<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; W.F. Gauster, Oak Ridge National Laboratory<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/wpw.bnl.gov\/rgupta\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/9\/2023\/02\/0946.pdf\">Superconducting Magnets for the 200 GeV Accelerator Experimental Areas<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; R.B. Meuser, Lawrence Radiation Laboratory, Berkeley<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/wpw.bnl.gov\/rgupta\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/9\/2023\/02\/0953.pdf\">Construction of a Superconducting Test Coil Cooled by Helium Forced Circulation<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; M. Morpurgo, CERN<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/wpw.bnl.gov\/rgupta\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/9\/2023\/02\/0962.pdf\">Summary of Fifth Week of Summer Study<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; W.B. Sampson, Brookhaven National Laboratory<\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity\" \/>\n\n\n\n<p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>SUPERCONDUCTING MAGNETS (Fifth Week) Chairman: W.B. Sampson, Brookhaven National Laboratory &nbsp;(Photos) Bill Sampson\u2019s week on superconducting magnets was the most popular of the Summer Study. Superconducting magnets were described, from the huge affairs under construction for large bubble chambers to miniature units suitable for transport of particle beams. It was during this week that Peter&hellip; <a class=\"more-link\" href=\"https:\/\/wpw.bnl.gov\/rgupta\/1968-week-5\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"screen-reader-text\">1968 Week 5<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":11,"featured_media":0,"parent":0,"menu_order":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":{"inline_featured_image":false,"footnotes":""},"class_list":["post-3786","page","type-page","status-publish","hentry","entry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/wpw.bnl.gov\/rgupta\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/3786","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/wpw.bnl.gov\/rgupta\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/wpw.bnl.gov\/rgupta\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/wpw.bnl.gov\/rgupta\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/11"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/wpw.bnl.gov\/rgupta\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3786"}],"version-history":[{"count":30,"href":"https:\/\/wpw.bnl.gov\/rgupta\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/3786\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":4504,"href":"https:\/\/wpw.bnl.gov\/rgupta\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/3786\/revisions\/4504"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/wpw.bnl.gov\/rgupta\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3786"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}